Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Surge Protector: The Role of Governments in Promotion of Alternative Technologies



The inclusion of green technologies into the world’s energy production sectors presents a number of opportunities for both developing and developed countries alike to pursue a pro-jobs agenda while improving mankind’s environmental stance.  However, because these new technologies are in their relative infancies, support from governmental institutions are critical to provide entrepreneurs with the necessary incentives to overcome start-up costs and keep these technologies cost-efficient until technological advances can bring operating costs down.  In providing these incentives, it is imperative for governments to provide a stable policy foundation to give businesses the time to make plans for growth in the intermediate-to-long term.  Yet, both domestic and international governments continue to equivocate and push policy decisions off towards the future, instead of creating this foundation for the present.  This piece aims to show why sound and well-reasoned green energy policy should be a critical facet of any government’s vision for the future of the country it represents.

The last few years have seen remarkable investments by developed and developing nations alike towards alternative energy initiatives in both the public and private sectors.  A combination of tax credits, combined with billions in current and proposed expenditures in 2011 alone, has helped to subsidize both technological advancements and utility construction towards wind, solar, geothermal, and tidal energy sources.  Rising oil prices and public pressure provided the impetus for these investments, but recently the trend towards alternative energy sources has begun to stall.  Total investment in green technologies (public and private sector) has dropped 28% from 2011 fourth-quarter earnings (Q4) to a current 27 billion in funds between the United States and Europe.  This represents a decrease of 22% from the previous year’s Q4 levels, and that pattern appears likely to continue in the future.  The primary tax credit for wind power in the United States, the Production Tax Credit, will expire at the end of 2012 unless renewed by Congress, and European governments are simultaneously looking to cull alternative energy investment as part of a general Union shift towards austerity and elimination of nonessential government services.  These policy changes have not gone unnoticed by the private sector; by the end of Q4 in 2011, private sector investment was down 87% from Q1 of the same year due to the slowing performance of alternative energy stocks.  A lack of coherent governmental policy vision for this sector will continue to hamper stock performances, and consequently act as a drag on private market investment into this field.  Providing a more stable policy foundation will help to ensure that nascent green technology companies can compete with established energy sources and carve out their own markets in the near future.

Additionally, in today’s job-starved economies, investment in green energy can provide a new, and environmentally responsible, source of employment opportunities.  Recently, leaders in the European Union met to discuss a new, pro-growth agenda to stave off an impending recession for the continent.  In their proposals, they discussed the impact of a green energy focus in providing millions of jobs over the next decade, commenting that “Job growth in the green economy has been positive throughout the recession and is [forecast] to remain quite strong.  Only the energy efficiency and renewable energy sectors could create 5 million jobs by 2020”.  To this effect, they propose a combination of environmental tax increases to encourage carbon-neutral industry formation, and a shift of taxation policies away from labor activities and towards energy and emissions outputs as a deterrent to traditional energy usage.  The commission’s representatives state that this pairing of tax strategies could lead to the creation of as many as 1.5 million new jobs, in addition to the two million jobs that can be created from enacting “energy-efficiency measures”, and the 500 thousand jobs created from the “increased recycling of key materials”.  Overall, the plan argues that over 20 million jobs could be created by 2020 if the reforms are adopted by EU member states.

While the Brussels plan offers promise as a starting point for a general transition towards an alternative energy economy, it is too early to tell at this point whether the plan will be ratified by the Union’s members.  It is important to keep in mind that the climate in Europe is currently not conducive to additional spending and taxation, as Europe’s leaders are taking a page out of the Austrian school of economic thought and pursuing a general program of austerity in the hope that fiscal discipline will stimulate economic growth.  Across the pond, the US is in an election year, and partisan gridlock in Congress will keep many policy initiatives from being enacted.  Nevertheless, it is imperative that green energy incentives and investment be continued, even in the face of prevailing attitudes towards budgetary constraints.  We have already seen that, without government support, private sector investment can drop off markedly because of the inherent risks associated with emerging energy markets.  It will take a solid, stable, long-term policy base to provide markets with the reassurance to invest in alternative energy utilities.  If the proper incentives are put into place today, green energy will continue to be a growth industry throughout the coming decade, and provide developed and emerging economies alike with a source of desirable employment.  

No comments:

Post a Comment